Print this Page
All areas of engineering work are governed by contracts, as well
as by other types of legal and quasi-legal regulation. This
is true of the work of professional consultants who design and
manage engineering works and it is true of the engineering
contractors who construct them.
A key feature of the law relating to engineering is that it is
highly specialised. This is reflected in the multiplicity of
forms of contract. Engineers accordingly need legal
advisors who are closely familiar with, for example, the
latest edition of the ICE form, the NEC, the I Chem E contracts or
the FIDIC ‘Rainbow’ suite. They also need legal advisors who
understand engineering processes and have experience of the
different disciplines, whether civil, structural, mechanical,
electrical, chemical or marine.
Members of Keating Chambers have that experience and
expertise. Chambers even boasts no few than six barristers
with engineering qualifications, covering the civil engineering,
electrical engineering and chemical engineering disciplines.
Their experience ranges from consultancy as an electrical engineer
on North Sea oil rigs to civils work in Hong Kong to electronics
work with the BBC’s Planning and Installation Department and to oil
and gas process work with BHP. With an ICE Gold Medallist, a
former IEE Vice-President and a member of the Hong Kong Institution
of Engineers, no other Chambers can match Keating Chambers’
engineering pedigree.
Members of Keating Chambers appear in cases which interpret the
major engineering forms of contract, and which shape the law as it
affects engineering practice. During the last 18 months
alone, barristers from Keating Chambers appeared in the following
case, illustrating the wide range of engineering matters
undertaken.
McAlpine PPS Pipeline Systems JV v
Transco on entitlement to interest under a NEC contract for
the laying of a gas pipe-line (Members of Chambers represented both
parties).
Rolls-Royce Power Engineering plc v
Ricardo Consulting Engineers. A 3-man team from
Keating Chambers appeared in a dispute over a design contract for
the development of diesel engines for power generation, pumping and
marine propulsion.
Henry Boot Construction v Alstom
Combined Cycles Ltd in the Court of Appeal on a contractor’s
right to payment under ICE 6th edition on a power station
project.
Yorkshire Water Services v Taylor
Woodrow Construction Northern where a two-man team
from Keating Chambers were successful in a dispute over performance
tests under the I Chem E Yellow Book form of sub-contract used on a
project for upgrading sewage works.
Further InformationFor further information on how our members can assist you, please contact the Senior Clerks,
John Munton and
Nick Child, in the first instance, on +44(0)20 7544 2600. They and their teams of Clerks will be pleased to advise you on the member of Keating Chambers appropriate to your requirements.