Harriet Di Francesco

Call: 2018

Email: hdifrancesco@keatingchambers.com

Tel: +44 (0)20 7544 2600

Practice Overview

Harriet Di Francesco was called to the Bar in 2018 and became a tenant at Keating Chambers following successful completion of her pupillage. She is developing a busy practice specialising in construction, engineering, procurement and international arbitration.

Since accepting her offer of tenancy, she has appeared regularly as an advocate in County Court hearings both at an interlocutory stage and at trial, and has accepted instructions both as sole and junior counsel. Most recently, she successfully prosecuted a claim on behalf of a major telecommunications provider in relation to damages caused to her client’s apparatus by an undertaker of street works.

Harriet accepts instructions from both international and domestic clients. She has experience in a range of dispute resolution including litigation, adjudication, international arbitration and ADR, and with many major standard form contracts including the JCT, NEC, FIDIC, RIBA and MF/1 standard forms. She has advised and drafted submissions in relation to both statutory and contractual adjudication proceedings.

During her pupillage, Harriet participated in the 2019 Worshipful Company of Arbitrator’s Arbitration Competition where she was awarded Best Individual Advocate as voted for by both the tribunal and the participants. Prior to commencing pupillage, she undertook a six-month traineeship at the ICC International Court of Arbitration in Paris where she drafted ICC Court documents and assisted with the scrutiny of ICC Awards.

Practice Areas
  • Construction & Engineering
  • International Arbitration
  • Procurement
  • Property
  • Adjudication
Construction & Engineering
  • Final Hearing (Bradford County Court): Harriet successfully prosecuted a claim for damages on behalf of a major telecommunications provider brought pursuant to Section 82 of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991.
  • Costs and Case Management Conference (Norwich County Court): Harriet appeared on behalf of a commercial real estate company in relation to a dispute concerning the development of a large rural estate and allegations by the claimant contractor of unpaid invoices.
  • Advised a firm of architects in relation to a dispute concerning unpaid fees under multiple contracts with a property development company for the provision of architectural design services relating to various redevelopment projects across the UK.
  • Drafted a particulars of claim on behalf of an interior fit out and refurbishment subcontractor for unpaid fees relating to additional works instructed by the defendant employer post-practical completion of subcontract works.
  • Final Hearing (Preston County Court): Harriet appeared on behalf of the defendant main contractor in a dispute with the claimant subcontractor concerning the supply and installation of soundproof acoustic panels. The dispute concerned unpaid invoices and a counterclaim for defective work.
  • Final Hearing (Oxford County Court): successfully defended a major telecommunications provider in relation to a claim for engineer call out fees.
  • Drafted a particulars of claim on behalf of a mechanical services company in relation to a claim for defective plumbing materials under the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
  • Drafted an amended defence on behalf of a construction company in a claim concerning allegations of unpaid invoices, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment.
  • Assisted in advising a construction company on the legality of an assignment of a contractor’s deed of warranty for the construction of a care home.
  • Assisted in a dispute concerning the scope of liability of an American contractor to remedy defects under an EPC contract with a Turkish employer for the operation of a digital power plant.
International Arbitration
  • Junior counsel in an international arbitration concerning a coal-fired power station in South Africa.
  • Assisted in a dispute concerning the design and installation of plant for the production of exotic oils under Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules 2016.
  • Assisted in a fees claim concerning design services delivered in respect of subterranean metro stations in Saudi Arabia.
  • Junior counsel in a claim concerning multiple challenges to the procurement of UK passenger rail franchises.
  • Junior counsel in a claim brought by a multinational rail transport company concerning the tender process for a rail services contract.
  • Assisted in a dispute relating to the legality of the decision of a public body to award a contract to construct a high-speed railway in the UK.
  • Advised a private homeowner in relation to circa 100 defects associated with works carried out by a building contractor at her residential property. The claim included damages for distress and anxiety.
  • Advised homeowners in relation to a defective kitchen extension and central heating system.
  • Advised an Italian contractor in relation to a dispute concerning unpaid fees for the supply and installation of luxury marble at a substantial private dwelling in London.
  • Directions Hearing and Early Neutral Evaluation (Winchester County Court) Harriet appeared on behalf of the respondents in respect of an appeal against a party wall award brought by the respondents’ neighbour.
  • Drafted a defence on behalf of a housebuilding company in respect of a claim for damages for stress and inconvenience brought by claimant homeowners.
  • Drafted a defence and counterclaim on behalf of a freehold owner of residential flats in relation to the negligent removal of dry rot.
  • Assisted in defending a claim concerning the after care of a new build residential property brought by the claimant homeowners against the defendant homebuilder.
  • Assisted in a dispute concerning the negligent renovation of a basement in a Grade 1 listed home constructed in 18th century.
  • Advised an international client in relation to a mandatory contractual adjudication provision and the application of payment provisions under the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
  • Advised a firm of architects in relation to statutory adjudication in circumstances where the client had entered into multiple contracts with potentially multiple responding parties.
  • Drafted a reply in a statutory adjudication concerning the absence of a payless notice on behalf of the successful referring party.
  • Assisted Emma Healiss, counsel for the successful defendants in Indigo Projects London Ltd v Razin & Anor [2019] EWHC 1205 (TCC) concerning the enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision by a claimant in a company voluntary arrangement (CVA).
Case Reports
Case Date
2019 Rail Franchising Litigation 17 June 2020