Jerram Falkus Construction Limited v Fenice Investments Inc (No. 3)

Citation: EWHC 1935 (TCC)

Nature of case:
The parties entered into a JCT Design & Build Form 2005 with amendments.Feniselevied liquidated damages for works delayed and Jerram counter claimed for loss and expenses, further contending Finesse’s own conduct as responsible for preventing completion of works. In the thirdadjudication between the parties Jerramwas found responsible for the delayswithno act of prevention by Fenisewhich rendered time at large. The court agreed with the decision of the third adjudicator.

Link to Judgment 


William Webb

  • Share