Wimbledon Construction Co Ltd v Vago

Citation: BLR 374 TCC

Nature of case:
This is a case on adjudication enforcement. Even if evidence of a successful party’s financial position indicated that it was probable that it would be unable to pay sums awarded at a substantive trial, that would not normally be sufficient to stay the execution of a summary judgment enforcing an adjudicator’s decision. Such evidence might, in principle, constitute special circumstances justifying a stay, but the purpose of adjudication, namely summary enforcement of an interim result, would normally prevail.

See other reports:

[2005] 101 Con LR 99 TCC.

Counsel

Simon Hughes QC

  • Share